In a recent post I discussed the gag order some doctors are trying to place on their patients to prevent them from posting negative information online. As I mentioned, the Internet is everyone’s playground, and the rules are few. Now courtrooms are discovering this to be true, as jurors are dropping hints about trials and their possible outcomes on such social networking sites as Facebook and Twitter. Easy access to the Internet by jurors, whether through laptops or cell phones, means many tend to let slip information that attorneys and judges would prefer be kept in the courtroom.
This article discusses instances where the Internet or Tweeting and Facebook status updates caused some problems, including one trial that was declared a mistrial because the judge discovered more than half the jury had conducted online research about the trial, even after being instructed to avoid media about the case. Many attorneys believe judges need to be clearer in their instructions to juries and to specify that not discussing the case means not discussing it in person or online.
So, jurors beware and be careful what you tweet!
This page has been written, edited, and fact-checked by our team of legal writers in accordance with our editorial guidelines. It has been approved by partners Jane Paulson and John Coletti—respected trial attorneys with decades of experience representing personal injury victims.
A crew from Paulson Coletti spent the day at the Habitat for Humanity Brooklyn Pines site on September 21 working to build a home...
We are excited to say that this year’s Walk, Roll ‘n’ Run raised more than $97,000 (PDF) for United Cerebral Palsy Association of Oregon...
Paulson Coletti is proud to be a continued sponsor of United Cerebral Palsy of Oregon & SW Washington’s (UCP) Walk, Roll ‘n’ Run, an...
385 First Street, Ste 217 Lake Oswego, OR 97034
Get directions